• Retail Dive

12 retailers at risk of bankruptcy in 2018


Six have already filed for bankruptcy in 2018, pointing to more struggles ahead. With data from CreditRiskMonitor, we looked at companies that may be vulnerable.

High consumer confidence, a healthy overall economy and a banner 2017 holiday season helped change the mood around retail going into the new year. But there are still dark spots in the industry.

And where it's still dark, it still looks as dark as 2017 — a year that beat out the recession era for retail bankruptcies. Many of the same problems remain for department stores and specialty retailers: traffic has declined at B- and C-class malls, Amazon and e-commerce's share of the pie is quickly growing, off-pricers and discounters have squeezed middle-tier names, and consumers are spending more on experiences over stuff.

And not least of all, there is still billions of dollars in debt out there coming due in the near future, much of it left over from a rash of leveraged buyouts of retailers by private equity firms in the past decade. The debt puts balance sheets under stress and the interest payments leave less money to invest in the business — a sure recipe for a death spiral.

Already this year there have been six major retail bankruptcies, including that of Bon-Ton Stores, the first major department store in years to liquidate. Most executives expect retail bankruptcies in 2018 to increase or keep pace with last year, according to a study from consulting firm BDO. S&P analysts have also noted that retail defaults could increase this year, as could liquidations. Moody's analysts said last week that retail defaults in the first quarter of this year hit an all-time high, though the ratings agency expects that defaults likely peaked in March.

With all that in mind, we're looking closely at who is still vulnerable. In putting together a list of retailers that could go bankrupt, we relied on data provided to Retail Dive by CreditRiskMonitor, a service dedicated specifically to predicting the risk of companies with publicly traded stock or bonds going bankrupt.

CreditRiskMonitor estimates the risk of a company going bankrupt within 12 months based on several streams of data, including financial ratios, bond ratings, a commonly used credit analysis model (the "Merton" model) and aggregated data patterns from its own subscribers, which include credit professionals and major corporations.

The service uses that data to assign a proprietary rating, called a "FRISK" score, that weighs the probability of bankruptcy. A FRISK score of one indicates a 9.99% to 50 % chance of bankruptcy within 12 months, and a score of two corresponds with a 4% to 9.99% chance of bankruptcy. (The scores continue to 10, which indicates risk near zero.)

The following was culled from lists of retailers with FRISK scores of one or two in the first quarter 2018 provided by CreditRiskMonitor executives.

J. Crew

FRISK score: 1

J. Crew underwent a massive expansion and tried to go upscale as consumers were changing their tastes and spending habits. The result: Declining sales, the departure of a longtime CEO and a $2 billion debt problem. Last June, J. Crew announced it had some relief in the form of a debt exchange.

Net losses for 2017 (which included a benefit for income taxes of $105.5 million) widened to $125 million from $23.5 million last year. In the fourth quarter, sales at the retailer's flagship brand fell 4%, but the Madewell unit lifted the entire company, with sales growth of 32%.

Neiman Marcus

FRISK score : 1

Neiman Marcus top-line sales in fiscal 2017 (which ended in July) fell around 5%, to $4.7 billion, compared to 2016. That's a tough hand for a retailer weighed down by a $4.8 billion debt pile, but the retailer has performed better in recent quarters. In the period that included the holiday season, Neiman increased its top-line sales, comps and posted a needed positive profit.

To boost profit and sales, the company has cut jobs and developed a "Digital First" strategy to engage customers more deeply. So far, it appears to be paying off.

Last June, acquisition talks broke down with Hudson's Bay, reportedly on concerns about the retailer's debt. Neiman Marcus, held by a group of private equity firms, had also earlier floated plans for an IPO that never materialized.

There's been executive turnover as well. In January, CEO Karen Katz, who had served in the chief executive spot since 2010, stepped down and was succeeded by Ralph Lauren executive Geoffroy van Raemdonck. Last year, the retailer also lost then-CFO Donald Grimes after little more than a year on the job. He has since been replaced by Adam Orvos, who took over from interim CFO Dale Stapleton. The company has seen additional turnover in its CMO and CIO spots.

A spokesperson for Neiman noted in an email to Retail Dive that the retailer had total liquidity of about $842 million at the end of Q2 (which ended late January), giving the company "the flexibility to strategically invest in our businesses." Neiman’s next major debt maturity isn't due until 2020, and it's long-term debt does not fully mature until 2021, the spokesperson said, adding, "We will continue to proactively manage our liquidity and capital structure."

Sears Holdings

FRISK score: 1

Sears Holdings' sales have been declining for nearly a decade. Years of cost cuts, store closures, asset sales and layoffs have, in most prior quarters, done little beyond slowing the loss of money. As media and analyst coverage have become increasingly gloomy, the retailer has lashed out at the media and publicly feuded with suppliers. It broke off ties with a major appliance maker in Whirlpool.

To date, Sears has avoided bankruptcy in part with the help of its CEO Eddie Lampert's hedge fund, which has loaned hundreds of millions of dollars (with interest) to the department store retailer. It also sold off owned property, piecemeal at times, and it could sell its Kenmore brand and home services units to Lampert's fund, after he propositioned the company he runs about a prospective deal.

In the fourth quarter, Seats posted a badly needed profit — though it's comparable sales dropped an alarming 15%. It has also bought turnaround time and freed up cash through a distressed debt exchange.

99 Cents Only

FRISK score: 1

99 Cents Only Stores operate in a low-margin space that's only gotten more competitive as Dollar General, Dollar Tree, Walmart and others battle for market share. The 35-year-old chain was bought out in 2012 by private equity firm Ares Management as well as the Canadian pension fund and a private family.

In February, the retailer named a new CEO and projected strong sales improvements. The company has indeed posted positive same-store sales growth for several quarters going. Yet 99 Cents Only is still losing money. In December, it reported a third quarter net loss of $27.1. That came on top of a $33.6 million in the second quarter and an $8.8 million loss in the first quarter. In December, the retailer announced it had completed a distressed debt exchange that S&P analysts said improved the company's liquidity "somewhat."

Ascena Retail

FRISK score: 2

Ascena operated at a $1.3 billion loss in its fiscal 2017 (which ended in July), and the retailer posted a net loss of $1 billion, after posting an $11.9 million loss in 2016 and a $236.8 million loss the year before that. The retailer went into the holiday season in need of "some holiday cheer," in the view of Moody's analysts, but instead it reported in March that top-line sales fell year over year again in the quarter, and comparable sales fell 2% across its units, with comps falling 8% at Ann Taylor and 1% at Loft.

In January, Ascena brought in a new chief for Dress Barn after poor performances in the unit. Ascena as a whole plans to close 250 locations, or 25% of its stores, by the end of 2019.

J.C. Penney

FRISK score: 2

J. C. Penney has been under pressure for some time, as the department store sector bleeds. It closed out the year with a shakeup in its executive offices, letting go of longtime chief merchant John Tighe in an effort to streamline merchandising operations. Earlier in the year, the company attempted a dramatic apparel reset, sweeping away much of its women's inventory. (Women's apparel accounts for 22% of the retailer's sales.)

Already in 2018, the retailer has axed more than 1,000 jobs and closed a distribution center. Store closures last year led to a 0.3% drop in top-line sales in 2017, and Penney's comps barely budged. Net income for the year was $116 million.

While the retailer has by and large performed better than Sears and Neiman Marcus, it carries a total debt load of about $4.2 billion, which aside from being a financial risk, limits J.C. Penney's ability to adapt to changes in the sector.

#Retailers #Bankrupcy

조회 1회